Nature, Death and Immortality: the Poetry of Walt Whitman and Emily Dickinson

Walt Whitman and Emily Dickinson shared some interchangeableities and had their differences when it came to the subjects of nature and of death and immortality. They shared a love for nature, but approached nature from different surveys. Certainly, Whitman mat a deeper contact to nature than did Dickinson. Both expressed death from the horizon of those left behind to deal with the aftermath. Also, while their views of immortality were not identical, they were akin(predicate) in that neither of them seemed to have expressed immortality in priming of a continued personal existence in the tralatitious Christian sense. Whitman felt a brotherhood with nature, a conjugation that Dickinson never achieved. This oneness was expressed in Out of the provenience Endlessly Rocking when Whitman said, But fuse the song of my dusky ogre and brother, / That he sang to me in the moonlight on Paumanoks sexagenarian beach, (sec 10). Whitman here referred to the bird as his brother, expressing a deep corporation to nature.

In section ten of Song of Myself, Whitman spoke of a comfort level with nature that Dickinson never would have felt when he said: Alone far in the wilds and mountains I hunt, Wandering amazed at my own lightness and glee, In the late afternoon choosing a safe spot to poking the wickedness, Kindling a fire and broiling the fresh-killd game, Falling toilsome asleep(predicate) on the gatherd leaves with my dog and gun by my side. His references to spending the night outdoors and cooking his game over a campfire were reliable things that would never have entered D ickinsons mind or poetryIf you want to smo! oth up a full essay, order it on our website: BestEssayCheap.com

If you want to get a full essay, visit our page: cheap essay