Essay on the Parliamentary System of Government

This is one mode of expressing the flexibility of the parliamentary arrangement. A nonher is the expertness with which it tail assembly tinct the crisis in the neighborly and insurance- devising biography of the hoi polloi. The executive suffer explain to and pretend upon the legislature its mind of the situation and the methods proposed to sate the emerging situation. so far well naturalised customs whitethorn be waived temporarily, as was done in Britain in 1931, when the Ministers hold to differ as against the primitive design of collective responsibility, to allude the abnormal situations. Moreover, parliamentary system can claim a high in plaster castative value. It cannot escape without well-organised political parties. The object of every political troupe is to win elections and to appropriate government. To win elections doer that the political party should be in a position to skilful the majority of votes and the electorate should extol its progr amme. It is like placing ones cards on the send back and acquainting the nation with the partys political programme. It is for the plurality to examine one party and the other on its merits. If an issue of theme importance arises subsequently, on which the verdict of the people had not been obtained by the party in cater, the legislature may be dissolve and an appeal make to the electorate. Dissolution alike helps to remove deadlocks amongst the executive and the legislature and makes the electorate the policy-determining factor. \nAccording to K. Leoewenstein, In the authentic form of parliamentary government, dissolution is the egalitarian fulcrum of the perfect process of adjusting power conflicts by making the electorate the ultimate policy determining factor. Moreover, by-elections, which atomic number 18 so shit during the life of Parliament, action as a barometer of public credence and the government corrects or adjusts its policies according to the results obt ained from such(prenominal) elections. All this democratic process has vast educative value. It makes the people politically intended of their rights and responsibilities, and vigilance is the received price of democracy. Finally, parliamentary system has succeeded in democratizing governmental machinery in all school countries, particularly where exists the sanctuary of hereditary monarchy. If Britain is called the stronghold of democracy, it is because there is constitutional monarchy and the King or Queen does not actively govern. He reigns but does not rule. \nThe latter is the function of his responsible Ministers. Bryce has capably explained this aspect. He says, As the actual working(a) Executive has needfully a party character it is a merit of this system that the National Executive, be the King or President, should be extracurricular party, and represent that long-lasting machinery of administration which goes on steadily irrespective of party changes when a cabine t fails, the transportation system of power to another(prenominal) is a comparatively short and elemental affair. \n