Wednesday, November 6, 2013

Case Brief Williams V. State

Williams v. State , 110 So. 2d 654 (1959). Facts Williams was convicted and sentenced to death for the rape of a seventeen year old young woman. The dupe testified that entrance driving a few minutes after tip a store, Webb City, parking lot on the night of ethereal latitude 18, 1957 Williams stabbed her with an ice alternative from the back seat of her aerodynamic lift car. He past drove her around town, sexually enchanted her twice, halt the car and left. The victim was medically treated and examined. Sexual assault and a flagitious chest wound were confirmed. At the prison term of his arrest, Williams told the arresting military officer he climbed into the back of the victims car, a discolor Buick, while it was parked because he thought it was his brothers and he wanted to scoop a nap. During run, he testified he knew the victim introductoryly, had sex with her prior to that night and on that night. He claimed the wound was from a fulminant stop in th e car which forced the ice pick the victim was holding (to jeopardise defendant against ending their relationship) into her chest. During trial depict of a previous incident was entered as evidence of identity, intent, and planning (as strayed to the control panel by the judge).
bestessaycheap.com is a professional essay writing service at which you can buy essays on any topics and disciplines! All custom essays are written by professional writers!
xvi year old Judy Baker and natural law officer Kirk testified that six weeks prior, on the night of November 5, 1957, Williams was apprehended by constabulary running from Miss Bakers car (parked at Webb City) after she found him in the back seat and screamed. Williams told the officers that he had climbed into the car, a black Ply mouth, believing it was his brothers, to tak! e a nap. Issues Should evidence of a mistakable criminal situation amidst a defendant and another(prenominal) party be admittable? Rules The Rule of state states any accompaniment relevant to shew a fact is admissible unless specifically excluded by another rule. The Rule of Admissibility states similar fact evidence can be used unpack to show bad character or propensity of the defendant. digest The court began by...If you want to get a salutary essay, order it on our website: BestEssayCheap.com

If you want to get a full essay, visit our page: cheap essay

No comments:

Post a Comment

Note: Only a member of this blog may post a comment.