Fall Of Napster The Fall of Napster A & M RECORDS, INC.,v. NAPSTER, INC., Defendant(s). nary(prenominal) C 99-05183 MHP UNITED STATES order COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF calcium 2000 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 6243; 54 U.S.P.Q.2D (BNA) 1746; Copy. L. Rep. (CCH) P28,072 May 5, 2000, Decided May 5, 2000, Filed On celestial latitude 6, 1999, plaintiff record companies filed suit alleging contributory and vicarious federal copyright infringement and related state integrity violations by defendant Napster, Inc. ("Napster").
Now [*2] before this court is defendant s motion for compact adjudication of the applicability of a secure harbor grooming of the digital Millennium Copyright Act ("DMCA"), 17 U.S.C. role 512(a), to its seam activities. Defendant argues that the entire Napster system falls inside the safe harbor and, hence, that plaintiffs may not obtain financial remediation or injunctive relief; except as narrowly specify by subparagraph 512(j)(1)(B). In ...If you want to get a amply essay, order it on our website: BestEssayCheap.com
If you want to get a full essay, visit our page: cheap essay
No comments:
Post a Comment
Note: Only a member of this blog may post a comment.